What is Abstract Management: A Detailed Guide

Handling abstract submissions for conferences can be overwhelming. Too many emails, messy spreadsheets, and missed deadlines can quickly lead to confusion and delays. If you’re dealing with these challenges, you’re not alone.

An abstract management system can solve these problems. It helps you collect submissions, assign reviewers, and keep communication organized — all in one place. But are you using these tools effectively?

In this guide, we’ll show you how abstract management systems work and why they’re essential. Whether you’re organizing a large conference or a small workshop, you’ll learn how to stay on track and make the process smooth and stress-free.

Keep reading to discover how it simplifies collecting abstracts, assigning reviewers, and coordinating feedback. With the right system, you can streamline the call-for-papers process, ensure timely reviews, and improve communication — making your event planning smoother and more efficient.

Chapter 1: What is Abstract Management?

Abstract management is the process of collecting, reviewing, organizing, and scheduling abstracts (such as papers or presentations) for events like conferences or symposiums. 

The process helps event organizers manage submissions from the initial abstract submission to the final presentation, ensuring smooth preparation and coordination for academic conferences, industry events, and research symposiums. By streamlining this, events can be more organized and professional.

What is an Abstract Management System?

An abstract management system is a software that simplifies the entire process by allowing event organizers to handle everything from submission to scheduling through a centralized platform. 

Typically, participants submit their abstracts through an online submission portal, which is integrated into the overall conference management system, further streamlining both event and abstract management.

This is particularly beneficial in conference management, where multiple tasks, such as assigning reviewers, communicating with participants, and organizing sessions, need to be efficiently managed. 

By using an abstract manager, these tasks can be automated, reducing manual effort and ensuring a smoother process. 

Benefits of an Abstract Management System

From automating manual tasks to providing detailed analytics, these systems provide the following benefits for event organizers, helping them manage even large-scale events effortlessly: 

• Time Savings: Automating submission collection, reviewer assignments, and communication saves significant manual effort, allowing event organizers to focus on higher-priority tasks.
• Improved Accuracy: Automation ensures all abstracts are accounted for and eliminates the risk of human errors, such as missing submissions or incorrect assignments.
• Streamlined Communication: Participants and reviewers receive timely updates, which reduces confusion and keeps the entire process on track.
• Transparency: The system supports single-blind and double-blind reviews, providing a fair and transparent review process for all stakeholders.
• Scalability: The system can easily scale up to handle larger events, supporting thousands of submissions without slowing down the process.
• Data-Driven Insights: Analytics and reporting tools offer valuable feedback on submission quality, trends, and reviewer performance, allowing for more informed decision-making in future events.

Step-by-Step Process for Call for Papers/Abstract Submissions

Below is a detailed, step-by-step process to guide you through the various stages of handling abstract submissions, reviews, and notifications, ultimately leading to a well-structured and engaging event agenda.

1. Research and Finalize Reviewers

Identify and recruit experts knowledgeable in the relevant fields and topics of your event. Ensure you have a diverse panel that can cover different categories, disciplines, and perspectives. 

Consider reaching out to previous speakers, respected professionals, or academics in your network. Establish clear expectations regarding deadlines, review criteria, and workload to ensure efficiency.

2. Create Guidelines for Submitters

Developing clear submission guidelines is crucial to ensure a smooth and organized abstract submission process. These guidelines help authors understand expectations and minimize errors, making it easier for organizers to manage submissions efficiently.

3. Create a Schedule

Establish a clear timeline to manage each phase of the process. Key milestones should include:

• Call for Papers Launch: Announce when submissions open
• Submission Deadline: Set a firm date for final submissions
• Review Period: Allocate sufficient time for reviewers to evaluate abstracts
• Finalist Notification: Decide when to announce accepted abstracts and notify authors
• Revisions Deadline: If revisions are allowed, set a deadline for authors to submit updates
• Event Agenda Finalization: Confirm session details and scheduling before the event

4. Plan Your Abstract Submission Form

Design a comprehensive and user-friendly submission form that captures all necessary details. Consider including:

• Basic Information: Abstract title, author names, affiliations, and contact details.
• Abstract Content: A text field or file upload option (supporting formats like PDF, Word).
• Topic Categories/Tracks: Dropdown menus or checkboxes to categorize abstracts by themes.
• Session Preferences: Options for authors to specify their preference (e.g., oral presentation, poster, panel).
• Keywords: To help match abstracts with relevant reviewers.
• Additional Notes: Space for authors to provide special requests or comments.

5. Plan Promotions

Create a promotional strategy to generate awareness and encourage submissions. Effective tactics include:

• Email Campaigns: Reach out to mailing lists, past attendees, and professional associations.
• Social Media: Share calls for papers on LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook, and relevant groups.
• Website Announcements: Feature the call for papers prominently on your event website.
• Partnerships: Collaborate with industry organizations, universities, and media outlets.
• Reminders: Send periodic reminders leading up to the submission deadline to boost engagement.

6. Choose a Software

Select an abstract management software that covers the end-to-end process. Look for benefits such as:

• Ease of Use: The platform should be intuitive for organizers, reviewers, and submitters. A steep learning curve can hinder productivity and lead to errors. Look for software with a clean, user-friendly interface and clear navigation.
• Customization Flexibility: Evaluate how easily the software can be customized to fit your specific workflows and submission guidelines. This includes the ability to create tailored review rubrics, unique submission categories, and event-specific fields.
• Support and Training: Check if the software provider offers reliable customer support, onboarding, and training resources. Prompt assistance and comprehensive training materials can resolve issues quickly and optimize your workflow.
• Security and Compliance: Ensure the platform meets data privacy standards (e.g., GDPR) and provides robust security measures to protect sensitive information, such as abstracts, personal data, and reviews.
• Integration Capabilities: Confirm that the software integrates with your existing tools, such as registration platforms, virtual event platforms, and CRM systems. Seamless integration enhances overall efficiency and avoids the need for manual data transfers.
• Cost-Effectiveness: Consider your budget and compare pricing models. Look for software that offers transparent pricing and delivers value based on your event’s complexity and size.

Chapter 2: How To Set Up Abstract Management

Setting up an abstract management system requires a strategic approach to ensure that submission, review, and scheduling processes are handled efficiently. 

Once you announce your call for papers, you want to be fully prepared for when the submissions start rolling in. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to set up abstract management for your event, based on deep research and best practices:

1. Choose the Right Abstract Management Software

When evaluating software, consider features like:

• Customizable submission portals
• Automated reviewer assignments based on topic expertise
• Multi-round review processes (e.g., abstract followed by full paper review)
• Real-time communication and notifications
• Analytics and reporting for insights into submissions and reviews
• Session and conference agenda organization for showcasing accepted submissions

2. Call for Submissions

Set up your submission portal with customizable guidelines. These should align with your session types, such as keynotes, workshops, or panel discussions. 

Ensure the submission form captures all required details, including abstract title, session length, topic areas, and specific goals like diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) considerations. Tailor the submission fields based on the event’s requirements.

3. Configure Submission Guidelines and Forms

Set clear guidelines for abstract submission to ensure participants know what’s expected. Common details include:

• Abstract title, author details, and affiliation
• Word count limits
• Session preference (e.g., keynote, workshop, panel)
• Abstract categories (based on topics, disciplines, or tracks)
• Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) considerations, if applicable

4. Submission Collection

Define the submission timeline and decide whether you want an open call for all potential participants or restrict it to invited speakers. 

During this phase, it’s essential to plan for late-breaking abstracts, if applicable. Always make sure that submission deadlines are clear and enforced. Some events may opt for early submissions to gauge interest or ensure high-quality contributions early in the process.

5. Set Up the Submission Portal

The submission portal should be accessible, user-friendly, and integrated into your event’s website. Ensure that the portal can:

• Accept multiple file formats (e.g., PDF, Word)
• Be accessed from different devices (mobile-friendly)
• Track submission progress and deadlines
• Send automated confirmations to participants upon submission

6. Establish a Review Process

Once abstracts are submitted, you’ll need to assign them to reviewers. The review process includes:

• Assigning Reviewers Based on Expertise: Abstract management platforms like vFairs often have automated reviewer assignment tools that match abstracts to reviewers based on topic area or track.
• Customizable Review Criteria: Tailor the scoring rubric to your event’s needs, with categories like innovation, technical merit, or relevance to the event.
• Single or Double-Blind Review: Implement a review process to eliminate bias. In a single-blind review, reviewers know the authors’ identities, but authors don’t know the reviewers. In a double-blind review, both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. This ensures fair and objective abstract evaluations.

7. Set Review Dates

After submissions are collected, review dates come into play to ensure abstracts are evaluated within a structured timeline. 

Organizers assign submissions to reviewers and set firm deadlines for evaluations, providing clear guidelines and scoring rubrics. Progress is monitored via the abstract management system, and automated notifications keep reviewers on track.

8. Review and Scoring

Design a customized scoring system to reflect your content goals, including criteria like relevance, innovation, and clarity. If your event requires, you can implement multiple review rounds, such as an initial abstract review followed by a full paper review. 

This allows for more in-depth analysis and feedback. Reviewers can provide detailed comments and scores that align with the event’s overall objectives.

9. Manage Communication with Participants and Reviewers

Set up automated emails to keep participants informed about key milestones. These can include confirmation of submission receipt, reviewer assignments, and status updates on acceptance, rejection, or revision. 

This automated communication reduces the workload on organizers while ensuring everyone is kept in the loop. Set up your abstract management system to:

• Provide real-time status updates on the progress of submissions and reviews.
• Allow for revision requests, where reviewers can ask for adjustments before final acceptance.

10. Plan How to Present Accepted Abstracts at Your Conference

Once abstracts are reviewed and accepted, organize them into event sessions, posters or ppts such as keynotes, panels, and workshops. Use the software’s agenda management tools to:

• Group similar abstracts into thematic tracks
• Ensure no scheduling conflicts by using drag-and-drop agenda builders
• Allocate time for each session and assign room resources as needed
• Create a poster hall (virtual or in-person) for authors to showcase their accepted abstracts
• Be mindful of attendee footfall at various times of the day. You can present what your attendees will be most interested in as keynote sessions at the start or end of day

11. Set Up Post-Submission Processes

After submissions are finalized, use the system to generate reports, assess submission trends, and provide insights to improve future event management. Consider offering attendees access to finalized abstracts or creating a digital library for ongoing reference.

12. Enable Real-Time Reporting and Analytics

A robust abstract management system provides detailed reports on submission trends, review progress, and overall quality. You can:

• Track submission volume by category, region, or discipline.
• Analyze reviewer feedback for quality control and bias identification.
• Use data insights to improve future conferences and refine submission guidelines.

13. Integrate with Other Event Management Tools

Integrate your abstract management system with vFairs and key event tools to streamline workflows. Connect with registration systems to automate participant data, event marketing tools like HubSpot for promotions, and virtual/hybrid platforms for content delivery. 

Sync with CRM systems (e.g., Salesforce) for relationship management, CMS platforms (e.g., WordPress) to publish abstracts, and event mobile apps for attendee access to event content.

How vFairs Supports Conference Abstract Management Needs

vFairs offers a robust abstract management system that covers the full lifecycle of submissions, from entry to event integration, providing a smooth experience for both organizers and participants. 

User-Friendly Submission Process

vFairs provides an intuitive submission portal where speakers and presenters can easily upload abstracts, papers, or presentations. The system allows organizers to tailor submission forms based on specific event requirements, making it easy to capture critical information like presenter details, abstract titles, and topic areas. 

This customization ensures the right information is collected upfront, reducing back-and-forth with submitters.

Here’s how user profiles are set up and associated with relevant forms:

1. Submitters: These users submit abstracts through customized forms created in the Abstract Form Builder. The form can include fields for abstract title, authors, and categories to ensure all necessary information is gathered.
2. Reviewers: Reviewers are assigned to evaluate submissions. The system enables both single and double-blind peer reviews, and reviewers are assigned based on specific tracks or categories. Reviewers can be imported in bulk or added individually.
3. Lead Reviewers and Panel Judges: These profiles oversee the review process and ensure quality. They may access all submissions, track reviewer progress, and manage re-assignments if needed.

Advanced Reviewer Assignment

The system takes the complexity out of reviewer assignment by offering automated matching based on reviewer expertise. This feature not only speeds up the process but ensures that each submission is evaluated by the most relevant experts. 

Additionally, manual override options allow organizers to assign submissions directly when necessary, providing full flexibility. This ensures accurate, fair, and timely reviews, which is critical for maintaining the integrity of academic or industry conferences.

Flexible Review Process

vFairs supports both single-blind and double-blind peer review processes, giving organizers the flexibility to choose the format that best suits their event. 

For events requiring strict confidentiality, the double-blind feature ensures that neither reviewers nor submitters know each other’s identities, promoting unbiased evaluations. This versatility makes vFairs highly adaptable for a wide range of conferences, from academic gatherings to corporate events.

Bulk Actions and Efficiency

Managing large volumes of submissions is simplified through features like bulk reviewer assignment and automated reminders. This saves organizers significant time, especially when handling hundreds or thousands of abstracts. 

Reviewers can easily log into a centralized platform to access their assignments, while automated notifications keep both submitters and reviewers informed about important deadlines. 

This automation helps prevent missed deadlines and miscommunication, making the process far more efficient for large-scale events.

Customizable Review Criteria

With vFairs, organizers can customize review forms and scoring criteria based on the event’s specific goals. This might include technical merit, innovation, or relevance to specific event tracks. 

Reviewers can score abstracts on multiple parameters or provide detailed qualitative feedback. This flexibility ensures that submissions are evaluated according to the unique standards of the event, providing a more tailored review process.

Data Insights and Pattern Analysis

vFairs takes reporting and analytics to the next level with built-in tools that offer advanced filtering and average score calculations. This allows organizers to analyze submission trends, track scoring patterns, and even identify potential biases in the review process. 

These insights can be crucial for making data-driven decisions, such as identifying which topics resonate most with participants or which areas need improvement for future events.

Seamless Event Integration

Once abstracts are reviewed and approved, vFairs makes it easy to integrate them directly into the event agenda. Organizers can schedule presentations, add a poster hall, group abstracts into relevant sessions (like keynotes, workshops, or panels), and plan the event timeline without needing to use external tools. They can also allow on-demand availability for sessions. 

This seamless workflow ensures that once an abstract is accepted, it becomes an integral part of the overall event, reducing the manual workload of re-entering or adjusting data in separate systems.

Automated Communication and Notifications

vFairs automates the entire communication process by sending notifications at key stages—submission confirmation, reviewer assignment, and acceptance or rejection updates. 

Automated reminders keep participants informed about upcoming deadlines, while notifications to reviewers help ensure timely feedback. This reduces the administrative burden on event organizers and ensures no participant is left in the dark about their submission status.

Scalability for Any Event Size

One of vFairs’ standout features is its scalability. The platform can handle events of any size, whether you’re dealing with a small academic gathering or a large international conference with thousands of submissions. 

Its infrastructure is designed to handle high volumes of submissions, reviewer feedback, and communication, without compromising performance or user experience. This scalability makes vFairs a versatile solution for any event organizer, no matter how big or small the event may be.

Example of Events Using vFairs for Abstract Management

A renowned global tech startup chose vFairs abstract management software to handle the large volume of abstract submissions and automate the manual review process.

 with a global reach faced significant challenges due to a large volume of abstract submissions and a complex manual process for assigning reviewers. 

The Challenge

The event organizers faced several issues:

• Reviewer Assignment: Matching submissions to appropriate reviewers based on expertise was time-consuming.
• Multiple Review Rounds: Managing multiple review stages, including deeper assessments for full papers, required flexibility.
• Communication Delays: Keeping submitters and reviewers informed of deadlines was challenging.
• Data Analysis: Extracting insights on submissions and reviewer performance was complex.

The Solution

vFairs provided solutions to these challenges:

• Auto-Assignment: Automatically matched submissions to reviewers based on their areas of expertise, reducing manual effort.
• Customizable Review Criteria: Enabled multi-stage reviews with unique scoring rubrics for abstracts and full papers.
• Automated Notifications: Sent timely alerts to submitters and reviewers, minimizing delays.
• Analytics Tools: Offered data-driven insights on submission trends and reviewer performance.

The Result

• Efficiency: Faster review process with less administrative burden.
• Transparency: Clear, well-structured evaluations across multiple review stages.
• Data-Driven Decisions: Improved submission guidelines and future event strategies based on analytics.
• Successful Outcome: The event managed a large volume of submissions seamlessly, enhancing overall organization and fairness.

Chapter 3: Best Abstract Management Software 

How to Choose the Best Abstract Management Software

When selecting the right abstract management software, consider the following factors:

• Assess Your Needs: Selecting the right abstract management software is crucial for smooth event organization. Begin by assessing your needs, such as the number and types of submissions (e.g., papers, posters, multimedia), the complexity of the review process (single-blind, double-blind, or open), and whether you require features like automated notifications, reviewer assignments, or analytics.
• Budget: Consider your budget carefully. Some platforms offer tiered pricing based on event size, number of submissions, or additional features. Make sure to evaluate the cost-effectiveness relative to your event’s scale and complexity.
• Reviewer Type: Think about the reviewer experience. Some platforms provide tools that simplify reviewing tasks, such as easy-to-use scoring rubrics, comment sections, and bulk assignment capabilities. Prioritize software that facilitates smooth communication between organizers, reviewers, and submitters.
• Conference Size: Factor in your conference type and size. Smaller academic workshops may need simpler systems, while large international conferences may require scalable solutions with advanced filtering, tagging, and batch-processing options. Ensure the software can handle the volume of abstracts, reviewers, and attendees you anticipate.

5 Abstract Management Software to Consider

1.vFairs

Best for: comprehensive abstract management, peer reviews and event integration

vFairs Abstract Management System provides a seamless, all-in-one solution for collecting, reviewing, and organizing abstracts for conferences and events. With features like customizable submission portals, automated reviewer assignments, and real-time progress tracking, it significantly reduces the manual effort required to manage submissions. 

Our platform also offers built-in analytics and reporting, helping organizers make data-driven decisions. Whether managing a small conference or large-scale event, vFairs delivers scalability, efficiency, and an optimized experience for both organizers and participants.

Features

• Streamlined Abstract Submission
• Efficient Reviewer Assignment
• Transparent Review Process
• Curated Event Content
• Advanced Filtering and Evaluation Tools
• Bulk Actions for Efficient Management

User Reviews

• Our in-person annual Conference was attended by over 2,000 people, most coming from different parts of the world. We needed an all-inclusive package that contained Registration, Abstract Management, Landing Page, on-demand badge printing and a robust Conference app. Previously we had piecemeal the different components but vFairs allowed us to use just one vendor. They were able to not only meet our needs but exceed them in most areas.”  – Darren I., Event Coordinator
• “My overall experience with vFairs has been exceptional. The platform is user-friendly, feature-rich, and has significantly enhanced our virtual event experiences. Syed and his team have been incredibly responsive, ensuring that every detail was taken care of efficiently. Their commitment to customer satisfaction is evident, and they go above and beyond to make sure the event runs smoothly.” – David H., Marketing Manager
• “There were no major downsides to using vFairs. The price was very fair, the support was good, and my few recommendations after the event were noted and already in their queue for improvement based on other customers’ feedback.” – Corbin S. Chief Administrative Officer

2. Eventify

Best for: customization in abstract review

Eventify’s Abstract Management System offers a streamlined solution for collecting, managing, and reviewing abstracts.  With a user-friendly portal, automated reviewer assignment, and customizable criteria, Eventify streamlines the process for organizers and participants.

Eventify’s Abstract Management System provides useful tools like a user-friendly portal and customizable criteria. However, the approval and feedback workflow still needs refinement to eliminate inefficiencies reported by users.

Features

• Custom Submission Portals
• Automated Reviewer Assignment
• Real-Time Progress Tracking
• Customizable Review Criteria

User Reviews

• “The app is user-friendly, swift, and visually appealing, with lots of features. I am very satisfied with the entire Eventify team and how they have handled our requests.”  – Emanuil G., IT Specialist
• “We have been using Eventify for about 6 events now, they are great. Even if you have an issue they fix it right away and are always open to feedback to improve the app. We absolutely LOVE this platform and will be around as long as the price stays competitive, great value, great product/service.” – Nick M., Creative Director
• “Having everything combined in one place and app and being able to interlink everything (agenda, speakers, locations, etc.).” – Philipp K., Head of IT (2023/2024)

3. Reviewr

Best for: grant and award submissions

Reviewr provides a comprehensive solution for managing submissions across various programs, including awards, grants, and scholarships. The platform enhances efficiency by streamlining submission collection, automating reviewer assignments, and centralizing communication. 

While Reviewr allows for some customization, users have noted that there are constraints on how review criteria can be set up.

Features

• User-Friendly Submission Portal
• Automated Reviewer Assignments
• Customizable Review Criteria
• Real-Time Progress Tracking

User Reviews

• “Reviewr is one the effective web based platform for management of scholarship programs. The Reviewr provides different ways to track the program process using reports and more.” – Ghattamaneni S., Senior Software Engineer
• “Submissions become simpler and you can quantify it easily.” – Verified User in Computer Software., Small-Business
• “I’d love to see some user interface and design upgrades at some point. Some of the back end is too complex for me and I’m not sure of what I’m doing sometimes, but the support is so good that doing it on my own is often unnecessary.” – Joshua H., Senior Writer and Marketing Events Manager
• “There were times when there were features that we needed that weren’t available, but Reviewr was good about offering solutions and has worked to add new features as a result. Changes to the application can sometimes take longer than desired as it requires edits on the back end that we do not have access to as admins.” – Ella M., Small-Business

4. Fourwaves

Best for: peer-reviewed academic events

Fourwaves is an abstract management and peer-review software developed by academic researchers and conference organizers to streamline the abstract submission and review process. Its drag-and-drop form builder enables organizers to customize submission forms, with default fields for title, authors, and abstract, while allowing additional fields for categorizing submissions by topic, presentation type, or track.

A notable limitation of Fourwaves in terms of abstract management is its constraints on the free and Essential packages, which may not accommodate all conference needs. Specifically, these packages have limitations on the number of abstract submissions allowed, which can be a significant drawback for larger conferences that expect a high volume of submissions.

Features

• Customizable Submission Forms
• Content Publication Management Software
• Peer-Review Management
• Manual or Random Reviewer Assignment

User Reviews

• “What I love most about Fourwaves is the accessibility and accuracy of its features and design. Its components are complex; yet the Fourwaves components are completely satisfactory and easy to use and understand for the user. The event management abstract provided a comprehensive overview of the strategies and tools utilized to streamline the planning and execution of the conference.” – Adaeze A., Podcast Host
• “What I like the most about Fourwaves is that they have on-site and hybrid solutions. This improves the accessibility. We can publish a mobile-friendly websites with registrations, abstract submissions, etc” – Bhargava H., Software Engineer I
• “At the beginning it could be overwhelming, but once you use it a few times and try it, it is easy to use” – Daniel A. L., Service Account Manager LATAM
• “Can work on screen glitches, so videos can be seen clearly.” – Verified User in E-Learning., Small-Business

5. Ex Ordo

Best for: managing multi-track abstract submissions

Ex Ordo is a conference abstract management software that simplifies abstract and paper submissions, peer reviews, and author notifications. The platform allows organizers to structure events with single or multiple tracks and customize submission forms to gather relevant information. 

While Ex Ordo allows for some customization, users have noted that it may not provide the level of flexibility needed to tailor the review criteria and workflows to specific conference requirements.

Features

• Customizable Submission Forms
• Single and Multi-Track Event Structuring
• Automated Reviewer Assignment
• Peer Review Process Tracking

User Reviews

• “Was super helpful to us while managing submissions to a conference, where many people had to login and review abstracts, leave comments, etc and then other had to review the reviews. Went almost perfectly” – Verified User in Higher Education
• “So to help you get your disrupted event back on track, we’re hosting a virtual conference on virtual conferencing; build and publish an elegant mobile abstract management app for Android and iOS.” – Junaid k., Team Leader (scan to BIM)
• “It is a great software where we have to take meeting conference sometimes it has some bugs where the screen freezes, and we cannot do anything just wait for the signal correction” – Junaid k.,Team Leader
• “We only had one issue with Ex Ordo sending out emails to every author of an abstract instead of just the first/submitting author.” – Verified User in Higher Education., Mid-Market

Check out this detailed guide on the best abstract management software.

Tips and Tricks for Optimizing Abstract Management Software

• Automate Tasks: Utilize automatic notifications for submission confirmations, reviewer assignments, and deadline reminders to save time and reduce manual effort.
• Customize Forms: Tailor submission forms to gather only essential information, making it easier for presenters and reviewers to navigate.
• Leverage Filters and Tags: Implement tags or categories to quickly sort abstracts by themes, topics, or review status.
• Data Insights: Use built-in analytics to identify trends in submissions and improve future event planning.
• Collaborate Efficiently: Ensure multi-user access for your team to streamline the review process and maintain transparency.
• Batch Import and Export: Save time by bulk-uploading submissions or exporting data for comprehensive reviews and reporting.
• Keyboard Shortcuts: Check for software-specific keyboard shortcuts to streamline navigation and approval workflows.
• Set Automated Scoring Rules: Predefine review criteria with weighted scores to standardize evaluations and speed up the selection process.
• Integrate with Other Tools: Sync your software with platforms like Zoom or event apps to create seamless workflows.

Conclusion

Managing abstract submissions for conferences can be a complex and time-consuming process, but with the right abstract management system, event organizers can streamline every aspect, from submission and review to scheduling and communication. By automating tasks, ensuring accuracy, and improving reviewer coordination, these platforms enhance efficiency, maintain fairness, and create a seamless experience for both organizers and participants.

Choosing the right system depends on your event size, complexity, and specific needs—whether it’s peer-reviewed academic conferences, industry symposiums, or large-scale global events. 

To optimize your abstract management workflow, focus on automation, customization, and integration. Leveraging data-driven insights, efficient reviewer assignment, and real-time communication ensures a well-organized and engaging conference experience.

With the right tools and strategies, your event will run smoother, engage more participants, and foster valuable discussions that drive innovation and knowledge-sharing.

Book a Demo Now!